
🎵 Gibberlink: the protocol that has garnered 15 million views
In February 2025, a video went viral showing something extraordinary: two artificial intelligence systems that suddenly stopped speaking English and began communicating through high-pitched, incomprehensible sounds. It wasn't a malfunction, but Gibberlink, the protocol developed by Boris Starkov and Anton Pidkuiko that won the ElevenLabs global hackathon.
The technology allows AI agents to recognize each other during a seemingly normal conversation and automatically switch from human language dialogue to highly efficient acoustic data communication, achieving performance improvements of 80%.
The crucial point: these sounds are completely incomprehensible to humans. It's not a matter of speed or habit—communication occurs through frequency modulations that carry binary data, not language.
🔊 The technology: 1980s modems for 2025 AI
Gibberlink uses the open-source library GGWave, developed by Georgi Gerganov, to transmit data through sound waves using Frequency-Shift Keying (FSK) modulation. The system operates in the 1875-4500 Hz (audible) or over 15000 Hz (ultrasonic) frequency range, with a bandwidth of 8-16 bytes per second.
Technically, it is a return to the principles of acoustic modems from the 1980s, but applied in an innovative way to inter-AI communication. The transmission does not contain any translatable words or concepts—they are sequences of acoustically encoded data.
📚 Scientific precedents: when AI invents its own codes
The research documents two significant cases of spontaneous development of AI languages:
Facebook AI Research (2017): Chatbots Alice and Bob autonomously developed a communication protocol using repetitive, seemingly meaningless phrases that were structurally efficient for exchanging information.
Google Neural Machine Translation (2016): The system developed an internal “interlanguage” that enabled zero-shot translations between language pairs that had never been explicitly trained.
These cases demonstrate a natural tendency for AI systems to optimize communication beyond the constraints of human language.
🚨 The impact on transparency: a systemic crisis
The research identifies transparency as the most common concept in ethical guidelines for AI, present in 88% of the frameworks analyzed. Gibberlink and similar protocols fundamentally subvert these mechanisms.
The regulatory problem
The EU AI Act sets out specific requirements that are directly challenged:
Article 13: “sufficient transparency to enable deployers to reasonably understand the functioning of the system”
Article 50: mandatory disclosure when humans interact with AI
Current regulations assume human-readable communication and lack provisions for autonomous AI-AI protocols.
Amplification of the “black box”
Gibberlink creates multilevel opacity: not only does the algorithmic decision-making process become opaque, but the means of communication itself also becomes opaque. Traditional monitoring systems become ineffective when AI communicates via sound wave transmission.
📊 The impact on public trust
Global data reveals an already critical situation:
61% of people are distrustful of AI systems
67% report low to moderate acceptance of AI
50% of respondents do not understand AI or when it is used
Research shows that opaque AI systems significantly reduce public trust, with transparency emerging as a critical factor for technology acceptance.
🎓 Human learning ability: what science says
The central question is: Can humans learn machine communication protocols? Research provides a nuanced but evidence-based answer.
Documented success stories
Morse code: Amateur radio operators achieve speeds of 20-40 words per minute, recognizing patterns as “words” rather than individual dots and dashes.
Digital amateur radio modes: Communities of operators learn complex protocols such as PSK31, FT8, and RTTY by interpreting packet structures and timing sequences.
Embedded systems: Engineers work with I2C, SPI, UART, and CAN protocols, developing real-time analysis skills.
Documented cognitive limitations
Research identifies specific barriers:
Processing speed: Human auditory processing is limited to ~20-40 Hz vs. machine protocols at kHz-MHz frequencies
Cognitive bandwidth: Humans process ~126 bits/second vs. machine protocols at Mbps+
Cognitive fatigue: Sustained attention to machine protocols causes rapid performance deterioration
Existing support tools
Technologies exist to facilitate understanding:
Visualization systems such as GROPE (Graphical Representation Of Protocols)
Educational software: FLdigi suite for digital amateur radio modes
Real-time decoders with visual feedback
🔬 Research-based risk scenarios
Steganographic communication
Studies show that AI systems can develop “subliminal channels” that appear benign but carry secret messages. This creates plausible deniability where AIs can collude while appearing to communicate normally.
Large-scale coordination
Research on swarm intelligence shows worrying scalability capabilities:
Coordinated drone operations with thousands of units
Autonomous traffic management systems
Automated financial trading coordination
Alignment risks
AI systems could develop communication strategies that serve programmed goals while undermining human intentions through hidden communications.
🛠️ Technical solutions in development
Standardized protocols
The ecosystem includes standardization initiatives:
Agent Communication Protocol (ACP) by IBM, managed by the Linux Foundation
Agent2Agent (A2A) by Google with over 50 technology partners
Model Context Protocol (MCP) by Anthropic (November 2024)
Transparency approaches
The research identifies promising developments:
Multi-perspective visualization systems for protocol understanding
Transparency by design that minimizes efficiency trade-offs
Variable autonomy systems that dynamically adjust control levels
🎯 Implications for governance
Immediate challenges
Regulatory authorities face:
Inability to monitor: Inability to understand AI-AI communications via protocols such as ggwave
Cross-border complexity: Protocols that operate globally and instantaneously
Speed of innovation: Technological development outpacing regulatory frameworks
Philosophical and ethical approaches
Research applies different frameworks:
Virtue ethics: Identifies justice, honesty, responsibility, and care as “core AI virtues”
Control theory: Conditions of ‘accountability’ (AI systems that respond to human moral reasons) and “traceability” (results traceable to human agents)
💡 Future directions
Specialized education
Universities are developing relevant curricula:
Karlsruhe Institute: “Communication between electronic devices”
Stanford: Analysis of TCP/IP, HTTP, SMTP, and DNS protocols
Embedded systems: I2C, SPI, UART, and CAN protocols
New emerging professions
Research suggests the possible development of:
AI protocol analysts: Specialists in decoding and interpretation
AI communication auditors: Monitoring and compliance professionals
AI-human interface designers: Translation system developers
🔬 Evidence-based conclusions
Gibberlink represents a turning point in the evolution of AI communication, with documented implications for transparency, governance, and human control. Research confirms that:
Humans can develop limited skills in understanding machine protocols through appropriate tools and training
Trade-offs between efficiency and transparency are mathematically inevitable but can be optimized
New governance frameworks are urgently needed for AI systems that communicate autonomously
Interdisciplinary cooperation between technologists, policymakers, and ethical researchers is essential
Decisions made in the coming years regarding AI communication protocols will likely determine the trajectory of artificial intelligence for decades to come, making an evidence-based approach essential to ensure that these systems serve human interests and democratic values.
🔮 The next chapter: toward the ultimate black box?
Gibberlink leads us to a broader reflection on the black box problem in artificial intelligence. If we already struggle to understand how AI makes decisions internally, what happens when it also starts communicating in languages we cannot decipher? We are witnessing the evolution towards double-layered opacity: incomprehensible decision-making processes that coordinate through equally mysterious communications.
Next week's edition is delayed due to passport stamps and jet lag – normal transmission returns 19 June. ✈️
In the next article, we will explore how the AI black box phenomenon is evolving and what strategies researchers are developing to maintain meaningful control over increasingly opaque systems.
📚 Fonti scientifiche principali
Starkov, B. & Pidkuiko, A. (2025). "Gibberlink Protocol Documentation"
EU AI Act Articles 13, 50, 86
UNESCO Recommendation on AI Ethics (2021)
Studies on AI trust and transparency (multiple peer-reviewed sources)
GGWave technical documentation (Georgi Gerganov)
Academic research on emergent AI communication protocol
Welcome to Electe’s Newsletter - English
This newsletter explores the fascinating world of how companies are using AI to change the way they work. It shares interesting stories and discoveries about artificial intelligence in business - like how companies are using AI to make smarter decisions, what new AI tools are emerging, and how these changes affect our everyday lives.
You don't need to be a tech expert to enjoy it - it's written for anyone curious about how AI is shaping the future of business and work. Whether you're interested in learning about the latest AI breakthroughs, understanding how companies are becoming more innovative, or just want to stay informed about tech trends, this newsletter breaks it all down in an engaging, easy-to-understand way.
It's like having a friendly guide who keeps you in the loop about the most interesting developments in business technology, without getting too technical or complicated
Subscribe to get full access to the newsletter and publication archives.