
49% of organizations know AI is creating value but can't prove it. Not because AI doesn't work—because we're measuring the wrong things...
Imagine having to explain the value of a dream to your CFO. That's exactly what happens when you try to measure the return on investment of artificial intelligence using traditional tools. Forty-nine percent of organizations find themselves in this Kafkaesque situation: they know that AI is creating value, but they can't prove it with numbers.
The problem is not technical, it is ontological. AI does not simply automate existing processes—it reinvents them, transforms them, elevates them to a higher cognitive dimension. It's like trying to measure the impact of movable type printing by counting only the pages produced, ignoring the revolution in knowledge it triggered.
When Numbers Lie by Omission
Business leaders are trapped in a gilded cage of familiar metrics: time saved, costs reduced, processes automated. But while financial returns remain crucial, the strategic value of AI extends beyond the balance sheet—from improved decision-making capabilities to customer experiences and operational efficiencies.
Take the case of a manufacturing company that implements an artificial intelligence system for inventory management. The system reduces inventory carrying costs and decreases lost sales due to out-of-stock items, leading to cost savings and increased revenue. But that's just the tip of the iceberg.
What traditional metrics miss is the cognitive ripple effect: managers, freed from repetitive operational decisions, begin to think strategically. Employees, supported by accurate forecasts, develop greater confidence in their decisions. The organization as a whole becomes more responsive and intelligent.
The Emergence of the Cognitive Enterprise
AI is evolving from an efficient automation tool to a cognitive partner integrated into strategic decision-making processes. This quiet transformation requires new measurement paradigms.
Consider how McKinsey describes this evolution: in the most advanced companies, algorithms participate in the decision-making process, offering insights that managers use to evaluate strategic options. We are no longer talking about automation, but cognitive amplification.
A concrete example comes from Grant Thornton Australia, where Microsoft 365 Copilot saves employees two to three hours per week. But the real value is not the hours saved—it's what employees do with those hours: think strategically, innovate, and build deeper relationships with customers.
The Dual Horizon Framework
To capture this multidimensional transformation, it is recommended to divide the return on investment into two measures over different time horizons: this allows teams to track both short-term progress and long-term financial value.
Emerging Return (Trending ROI)
These are early indicators that suggest the AI initiative is creating value, even if that value has not yet manifested itself as revenue or cost savings:
Decision speed: How long does it take managers to make complex decisions?
Quality of choices: How many decisions are subsequently reviewed or corrected?
Diversity of solutions: How many alternatives are considered before a decision is made?
Cognitive confidence: Do employees feel more confident in their assessments?
Realized ROI
The quantifiable, results-oriented impact of the AI investment:
Supply chain optimization
Improved operational efficiency
Reduced regulatory penalties through fewer errors
Increased customer satisfaction and loyalty
The Human Equation of Artificial Intelligence
Gartner's framework introduces a revolutionary perspective: balancing Return on Investment (ROI), Return on Employee (ROE), and Return on Future (ROF), explicitly recognizing intangible and long-term benefits.
Return on Employee is particularly illuminating. AI improves perceived autonomy through intelligent task delegation. In creative domains, AI-generated preliminary designs serve as cognitive scaffolding, allowing employees to focus on high-level ideation.
Newman's Own offers a tangible example: by saving 70 hours per month in summarizing industry news and another 50 hours per month in preparing marketing briefs, it has significantly improved employee engagement and retention.
The Complex Equation: Productivity vs. Well-being
Measuring the value of AI reveals an unexpected complexity: while it objectively increases productivity, it can generate what researchers call “technostress”—the cognitive fatigue that comes from constantly adapting to new technological tools.
This duality is not a bug, it is a feature that requires sophisticated measurement. Data shows that effective AI mitigates its own negative effects: when systems are well designed and integrated into workflows, the increase in perceived autonomy compensates for the initial stress of adoption.
Implications for measurement:
Monitor both productivity and stress indicators in the first 90 days
Track the adaptation curve: stress decreases as effectiveness increases
Include well-being metrics in the calculation of ROE (Return on Employee)
This dynamic balance confirms that AI is not only an efficiency multiplier, but a transformer of the work experience that requires multidimensional indicators.
Organizational Regeneration
AI implementation is not a technology project—it is an organizational metamorphosis. Companies must adapt their structure and processes to take full advantage of AI: this may mean revising decision-making flows to include data-driven insights, or rethinking coordination mechanisms between departments.
McKinsey points out that workflow redesign has the greatest effect on an organization's ability to see EBIT impact from its use of generative AI. It is not enough to install intelligent tools—we need to rethink how we work.
Cognitive Indicators for the New Paradigm
Here are concrete metrics for measuring cognitive transformation:
Decision-making dimension
Average time for strategic decisions (baseline vs. post-AI)
Number of scenarios analyzed per critical decision
Percentage of decisions reviewed within 30 days
Correlation between AI use and outcome quality
Creative dimension
Innovative behaviors enabled by AI through improved creative self-efficacy
Number of ideas generated per project
Time from ideation to implementation
Diversity of solutions proposed by teams
Organizational Dimension
Level of employee trust in AI tools
Speed of adoption of new features
Correlation between AI usage and job satisfaction
Talent retention in AI-enhanced teams
Practical Implementation
Phase 1: Cognitive Archaeology
Before implementing AI, create a detailed map of “how you decide today”:
Document current decision-making processes
Measure the timing and quality of decisions
Assess the level of cognitive stress among employees
Identify points of friction in the workflow
Phase 2: Designing Intelligent Indicators
Sophisticated organizations recognize that their performance indicators need to be smarter and more capable. They invest in algorithmic innovations to make their metrics more intelligent, adaptive, and predictive.
Phase 3: Continuous Monitoring of Metamorphosis
AI evolves, and so must your metrics. Implement real-time dashboards that capture both operational efficiency and cognitive enhancement.
Beyond the Horizon: The Future of Measurement
AI can lower skill barriers, helping more people acquire skills in more fields, in any language, at any time. This transformative potential requires measurement tools that are up to the task of the ongoing revolution.
The goal is not to replace traditional financial metrics, but to supplement them with indicators that capture the cognitive and emotional dimensions of transformation. Because in an era where AI amplifies creativity, productivity, and positive impact, measuring only efficiency means missing the big picture.
The Silent Revolution
While we continue to debate whether AI will replace human jobs, it is already replacing something more profound: the way we think, decide, and create value. Organizations that can measure and optimize this cognitive transformation will not only survive the AI revolution—they will lead it.
The question is not whether you can afford to invest in AI, but whether you can afford not to measure its cognitive impact. In a world where artificial intelligence amplifies human intelligence, those who measure better, win better.
References and Sources:
Welcome to Electe’s Newsletter - English
This newsletter explores the fascinating world of how companies are using AI to change the way they work. It shares interesting stories and discoveries about artificial intelligence in business - like how companies are using AI to make smarter decisions, what new AI tools are emerging, and how these changes affect our everyday lives.
You don't need to be a tech expert to enjoy it - it's written for anyone curious about how AI is shaping the future of business and work. Whether you're interested in learning about the latest AI breakthroughs, understanding how companies are becoming more innovative, or just want to stay informed about tech trends, this newsletter breaks it all down in an engaging, easy-to-understand way.
It's like having a friendly guide who keeps you in the loop about the most interesting developments in business technology, without getting too technical or complicated.
Subscribe to get full access to the newsletter and publication archives.

